Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
if you live in #canada, you generally assume that ranchers
* can't spell champagne
* make incredibly gross, wierdly creamy champagne
* put champagne on their vegetables
@cube_drone
All of the above. Read about it here:
Ultra-Processed People: Why We Can't Stop Eating Food That Isn't Food by Chris van Tulleken
@demerara @cube_drone@mastodon.sociaAnd look how the USDA answered. I've never seen so many oxymorons in one title.
They aren't scientists, this isn't healthy, and UP is not Foods.
This sample menu is 91% UPF
Scientists Build a Healthy Dietary Pattern Using Ultra-Processed Foods
https://www.ars.usda.gov/news-events/news/research-news/2023/scientists-build-a-healthy-dietary-pattern-using-ultra-processed-foods#:~:text=GRAND%20FORKS%2C%20N.D.%2C%20July%2011,using%20the%20NOVA%20scale)%20while
@WayofCats
Well that article explicitly rejects the idea of UP having bad effects with this:
"According to current dietary recommendations, the nutrient content of a food and its place in a food group are more important than the extent to which a food was processed."
I'd love to know who is paying this group of writers...
@demerara The PR Department, of course.
There was an email address for comment. I gave them some. I almost said, "You sit upon a throne of lies."
@WayofCats
Found the conflicts of interest, at least they published some of them!
