Back

Apple lawyer blames the DMA for forcing this change, after his pat line about how Apple has driven innovation over 15 years. But he says they don't want to penalise "the dreamers", so "stay tuned". Which on the face of it sounds good, but no-one should pay a fee if their app gets installed on an expensive device owned by someone who has *already paid Apple* a premium for the core technology it contains. Would people buy an iPhone if there were no apps available?